
This plan, however, carries risks. Washington now boasts one of the oldest rosters in the league, which could become a liability if injuries begin to stack up. Still, with the team no longer playing the underdog role and instead being a squad others are targeting, the hope is that these experienced players quickly adapt to the culture shift and provide stability. The influx of new personalities must align with the franchise’s evolving identity if success is to follow.
Adam Peters approached this offseason with sharp intent and a revised strategy. Initially, there was a sense that the Washington Commanders were still a few steps away from serious contention. But that perception shifted quickly, prompting Peters to make bold, headline-grabbing moves. The team acquired big-name talents like Deebo Samuel Sr. and Laremy Tunsil via trade, signaling a more aggressive pursuit of immediate success. While Javon Kinlaw’s signing was a notable financial investment, many of the new arrivals were brought in on shorter, one-year contracts—a strategic approach that proved fruitful in the past and could again serve the team well.
While the revamped roster might spark renewed hope for a deep playoff push, not every addition will leave a lasting impact. That’s just the nature of the business. Peters believes he’s cracked the formula for sustainable growth in D.C., but not all players brought in during this transition will be part of that long-term vision. Some will fit. Others won’t. And for a few, 2025 may be their only year in a Commanders uniform.
One player who might fall into that category is Eddie Goldman. After Washington parted ways with Jonathan Allen—granting him an early release that helped him land in Minnesota—Peters moved quickly to fill the void. His familiarity with Kinlaw, built during their shared time in San Francisco, helped justify what some see as an overpay. Goldman’s signing, by contrast, flew largely under the radar. Having come out of retirement to briefly suit up for the Falcons in 2024, Goldman arrives in Washington with minimal fanfare but plenty to prove.
Despite being relatively fresh due to missing three of the last five seasons by choice, it’s hard to picture Goldman as anything more than a temporary piece in this defensive puzzle. His contract reflects that reality—a one-year agreement that gives both parties flexibility. Unless he significantly outperforms expectations or carves out a critical role in the rotation, Goldman is likely one of several players whose time in Washington could be short-lived.